An Indispensable Churches Post
Hermann Sasse, one of the great Lutheran theologians of the 20th Century, once wrote
A church that does not continually gather around the [Lord’s] Supper must undergo secularization. It must irreversibly turn into a piece of the world, because the Supper establishes the boundary between church and world. This conclusion is confirmed by the experience of church history and especially of the history of worship in the last few centuries. The destruction of the Supper is followed by the disappearance of the living remembrance of Jesus from the hearts of Christians, especially of his suffering and death.
Thus, in the century of the Enlightenment, the fading away of the person of Jesus as the biblical Redeemer into an indeterminate universal teacher, who might just as well be called Moses or Socrates, was bound up with the decline of the Supper as the celebration of his inextinguishable remembrance. . . . Where Jesus Christ no longer himself speaks to us in the Holy Supper the Gospel “given and shed for you for the forgiveness of sins,” the message of the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world necessarily fades away.
– Hermann Sasse, “Church and Lord’s Supper” in The Lonely Way (St. Louis: CPH, 2001), pages 420-421.
“The Supper establishes the boundary between church and world.” What do you think about that? First of all, that there should be such a boundary, a place church and world may meet but not intersect. A place where church and world may greet one another, may perhaps glare at one another, but not join with one another. A place where church and world say to each other, “you stay on your side, and I’ll stay on mine.”
But how fluid is this boundary? Can we come and go with ease across it, moving from church to world and back again without impediment? Should we come and go with ease across it? Or should it be a firmer boundary, a border we cross with difficulty, a boundary we cross at our peril except at the approved Gate (John 10:7-10)?
And what if this boundary is removed? If there is no boundary between church and world anymore, does the world become like the church or does the church become like the world? Observation of recent history would suggest the latter. And if the Lord’s Supper fades into unimportance in the life of the church, to be superseded by technology, prosperity, “growth,” or attendance as indicators of the health and well-being of the church, does the Gospel also necessarily fade into the background? And when the Gospel fades into the background, shall not the church fade away into the background and then into oblivion as well?